Video: [link]
I need to reiterate the two principles:
Let's proceed then with the purification.
It's my honor and privilege tonight to introduce you to the dragon.
I'm warning you there's quite a bit of esoteric meaning and ritual and linguistics.
Part of "Nick's" letter
Anacharsis - Kind of the George Washington of the Scythians.
I'm going to take you back, and make you look into the face of that Queen.
So what do we say about Aryans?
His people took the name AriansNotice Arians here is with an i
And all of a sudden you smell.. what do you smell? 1898.
and you smell some Scholars and some intellectuals in Germany.
Descendants of them are now in places like Iran, Ireland, Romania, Armenia, Etc.
It's the sources that matter
You're like a detective when you look at history. You have to piece things together -- that cadaver was shot but if you don't find a hole and a bullet you've got problems.
There will be those of you who will be seduced by the academics.
Once you're in these texts that provides you with an immunity.
There's two types of people -- people who know this evidence, who can read it, and those people who read every day, they wake up in the morning, they read ancient Greek.
I'll show you in a minute how the victorians very nicely sifted out for us but that by the time of Strabo, there's this active debate about what's the real root right is it -- Alpha rho upsilon -- αρυ or is it -- Alpha rho iota -- αρι?
and Nick would be jumping around saying "this is a Sanskrit route". It's not!
On the Greek side this word has its own derivation.
and I'll show you the texts that talk about that derivation
and I'll show you cannabis in Antiquity.
The question tonight is: What is the street name of cannabis, In Antiquity?
I can't wait to show you.
We saw an email from someone named Nick, admonishing Dr Hillman for the topics he studies, specifically the concepts of both satan and pedophilia found in the Ancient Greek Language source texts.
Nick, no one advocates for the pedophilia, especially Dr Hillman or anyone associated, yet it exists in the historical texts. Why should he distance himself?
Dr Hillman's field of study is sometimes mis-understood as "support", and Nick here wrongly attributes support where it doesn't exist.
Only the sources matter. It's an inquiry of history.
See LadyBabylon FAQ
Look at Aruou (ἀρύω) here:
II. Med., draw water for oneself, ἀρυσσάμενος ποταμῶν ἄπο having drawn water from . . , Hes.Op.550; “σφῷν ἀρύσασθαι” Pherecr.130.5; “ἀρύσασθαι ἀπὸ τοῦ ποταμοῦ” X.Cyr.1.2.8; “ἐκ τοῦ κρατῆρος” Pl.Criti.120a: c. acc., “ἀρύσασθαι ὑδάτων πῶμα” E.Hipp.209; “ἀ. ἐκ τῶν ποταμῶν μέλι καὶ γάλα” Pl. Ion534a: c. gen. partit., “ὑδάτων ἀ. πρόχοισι” Ar.Nu.272; ἐς τὸν κόλπον τρὶς ἀρυσάμενος τοῦ ἡλίου having (as it were) drawn the rays of the sun into his bosom, Hdt.8.137: generally, draw in, τροφῆς καὶ πνεύματος Diog.Bab. ap. Gal.5.281; “μαντικῆς” Plu.2.411f; πλοῦτον Id.Caes. 29; “καιροῦ καὶ τύχης” Eun.Hist.p.256 D.2. of stars rising from the sea, “οἵ τ᾽ ὠκεανοῦ ἀρύονται ἀστέρες” Arat.746.
We have the same root in words like Hera (ἣρη), and Ares (ἂρης).
Shared roots:
Why can't we turn away from the pedophilia by the way? Why can't we?
It starts here with aruou (ἀρύω).
What are you raising out of the sea?
Well, we're raising Aryans.
I want to show you the arioi (αριοι) and how it is that the victorians define them.
The ancient name of the Medes!
II. inhabitants of the Persian satrapy of Ἀρεία (Arr.An.3.25.1), Pers. Haraiva, Hdt.7.66; written Ἄρειοι, Id.3.93, Arr.l.c.
Notice: The Iranian highlands; Later with respect to Persia.
This is a section of Herodotus
After Medea arrived from Athens (Which Medea or which medwa? The Colchian medwa). After she arrived from Athens, the people there, the Aryans changed their name to the Medea to suit her and this is what they all call themselves
I just want you to notice that the victorians are noticing that the root is changing from the ari- (αρι-) to the aru- (αρυ-), and why is it why would we have we can read here at the bottom modern philology gives the name Aryan
This is a linguistic debate at the time, (because there are these excellent things) and these are the authors that these people who claim knowledge and just give you generalizations.
(You know we're detectives. This is history and we're detectives you better bring me some evidence and you better lay it out)
Religious historians love the ideas and the theories
So what about these Aryans, aruou (ἀρύω), that "drawing" is the very thing that the Medoi become known for doing - that connection to "drawing down".
Can you draw the Stars?
In order to get there to those Stars we got to go through a dragon, who is protecting a Sacred Space.
What is a dragon?
II. the constellation Draco, Arat.46, al., Man.2.69.
III. a sea-fish, the great weever, Epich.60, Arist.HA598a11, Hp.Vict.2.48.
IV. = κηρύκειον, prob. a wand with a serpent coiled round it, S.Fr.700 (cf. 701).2. serpent-shaped bracelet or necklace, Luc.Am.41.
3. a noose or crossed bandage for the ankle, Heraclas ap.Orib.48.5.1.
4. dragon-standard, Lib.Or.1.144, Them.Or.18.219a, cf. Or. 1.2a: hence, corps of 1,000 men in the Parthian army, Luc.Hist. Conscr.29.
By the way, we cannot give up that pedophilia:
Yeah, I'm gonna show you Moses's stick here in a second...
All of these words come from somewhere. they all have roots and these roots have histories. they're their own organisms.
Back to the dragon (δράκων), what is it?:
Look at Roman numeral number iv:
Who's the kerux (κηρύξ)?
What are the victorians pointing out there under dragon (δράκων)? It's a wand, with a serpent coiled on it.
So the drakon (δράκων) is the wand with the serpent coiled.
For those of you who want to jump ahead to Jung (shut up, Jung!).
You'll find the serpent wand, and who has it?
Did Jung know about dragons?
We have two sources that tell us the dragon, like the wolves, are Temple Guardians.
That's the sacrifice Nick has to pay (remember Nick was worried about researching the icky stuff?).
Thinking about the Aryans (with the Y).
Who are these people and what's with all their cannabis?
We know that Herodotus spills the beans on the cannabis.
Let's just go now to the Cannabis in the ancient text now.
Look at these Scythians.
Yes and if you would read...
I hereby summon Discoredes, great pharmacologist
Anyway he's got a great section... (we need to get to the oistros as well...)
Diascoredes is the one who is
and he's also writing about
and cannabis (κάνναβις) there: you guys see cannabis (κάνναβις) in its original Greek form
The Romans call their stuff "kannabem" (κάνναβεμ) he has street names for the drugs that are used. And as you can see here, asterion (ἀστέριον) is one of the common (street) names, he says that the street name is asterion (ἀστέριον).
you go to the marketplace and you order up some asterion (ἀστέριον)
and what is asterion?
Notice that it's got the STR root that everybody is looking for.
Joking like a gangster: "Give me some little star, man!"
I need to go where the Aryans go (in the texts), because the Scythians, we know, are into the star.
Why did they call it star?

Now, I want to take you to some oistros
We're scientists here, reason first, we don't just jump in, remember that!
Look at the Doric aousphoros (Ἀωσφόρος), do you like that?
I tell everybody in the Greek class it comes from the verbs, and the vowels are really adjusting (fine-tuning) the root.
But, It's not the vowels that matter, it's the consonants that carry the weight.
What is this word?
This morning star
This Aryan exhibition is the place to spill this blood...
Recently on a podcast a Harvard religious studies expert said that "Lucifer didn't exist", that "this is a later invention", etc etc... NO!
What I'm saying to you, is that Lucifer is a Bronze Age figure.
and for those of you who are interested in the vampire side of that:
For those of you who are interested in the Viper side of that, and the actual vampires, and the Order of the dragon, and Vlad and the Impaler, and his court poet:
What are they doing with the rose-colored skin?
There's the dawnbringer, by the way.
YES! It's NOT Semitic! It's actually not a Semitic word!
Satan, Saturn, STR
What is the oistros if Satan and Saturn have a bunch of satyrs? Are you a satyr of Saturn?
If you really want to strive to be a good Satanist you have to be a Satan satyr of Saturn. you have to have satyriosis after taking satyrion. and why would you take satyrion? in order to become a satyr of Saturn.
Why would you do that?
And you wonder, was that guardian there for the sake of the oistros?
2. an insect that infests tunny-fish, prob. Brachiella thynni, ib.557a27,602a28.II. metaph., a sting, anything that drives mad, “κεραυνοῦ οἶ.” E.HF862 ; “οἴστροις Ἐρινύων” Id.IT1456 : abs., the smart of pain, agony, S.Tr.1254.
3. a small insectivorous bird, perh. Sylvia trochilus, ib.592b22.2. any vehement desire, insane passion, Hdt.2.93, E.Hipp.1300, Pl.R.577e, etc.; “ὄρεξις μετὰ οἴστρου καὶ ἀδημονίας” Epicur.Fr.483 : c. gen. objecti, κτεάνων for wealth, AP11.389(Lucill.): generally, madness. frenzy, S.Ant.1002, E.Or.791 : pl., Id.Ba.665 ; “μανιάδες οἶ.” Id.IA548(lyr.).III. a throw at dice, Eub.57.5.
3. in good sense, zeal, “οἶ. εἰς πᾶν ἀγαθὸν ἔργον” PMasp.3.13(vi A. D.).
Erinuese (Ἐρινύων)
In the orphic hymns there's a beautiful hymn dedicated to Melinoë (Μηλινόη):
Addressed to a liminal, night-wandering figure whose very being is unstable.
She is described as:
It is closer to a ritual address meant to stabilize or appease something that crosses boundaries too easily.
In Orphic cosmology, Melinoë (Μηλινόη) is often said to be born from Persephone, sometimes through Zeus in a chthonic or disguised form. That detail matters less genealogically than functionally.
Melinoë (Μηλινόη) is the unsettling presence of the unseen (when it leaks into your perception)
The hymn acknowledges fear without demonizing it.
The Orphic Hymn to Melinoë (Μηλινόη) refers to a chthonic, dream-appearing goddess who embodies the unstable emergence of the unseen into human perception — and is addressed ritually not to worship terror, but to contain it.
Let's talk about chriou (χριω):
I. rub, anoint with scented unguents or oil, as was done after bathing, freq. in Hom., “λόεον καὶ χρῖον ἐλαίῳ” Od.4.252; “ἔχρισεν λίπ᾽ ἐλαίῳ” 3.466; “λοέσσαι τε χρῖσαί τε” 19.320; of a dead body, “χρῖεν ἐλαίῳ” Il.23.186; anoint a suppliant, Berl.Sitzb.1927.170 (Cyrene); πέπλον χ. rub or infect with poison, S.Tr.675, cf. 689,832 (lyr.): metaph., “ἱμέρῳ χρίσασ᾽ οἰστόν” E.Med.634 (lyr.); “οὐ μέλανι, ἀλλὰ θανάτῳ χ. τὸν κάλαμον” Plu.2.841e:—Med., anoint oneself, Od.6.96; “κάλλεϊ ἀμβροσίῳ οἵῳ . . Κυθέρεια χρίεται” 18.194, cf. Hes.Op.523; “ἐλαίῳ” Gal.6.417; “ἐκ φαρμάκου” Luc. Asin.13: c. acc. rei, ἰοὺς χρίεσθαι anoint (i. e. poison) one's arrows, Od.1.262:—Pass., “χρίεσθαι ὑπὸ τοῦ ἡλίου” Hdt.3.124; βακκάριδι κεχριμένος Magnes l. c.; “συκαμίνῳ τὰς γνάθους κεχριμέναι” Eub.98.3: metaph., “Σοφοκλέους τοῦ μέλιτι κεχριμένου” Ar.Fr.581.2. in LXX, anoint in token of consecration, “χ. τινὰ εἰς βασιλέα” 4 Ki.9.3; “εἰς ἄρχοντα” 1 Ki.10.1; “εἰς προφήτην” 3 Ki.19.16; also “χ. τινὰ τοῦ βασιλεύειν” Jd.9.15: c. dupl. acc., “χ. τινὰ ἔλαιον” Ep.Heb.1.9.II. wash with colour, coat, “αἰγέαι κεχριμέναι ἐρευθεδάνῳ” Hdt.4.189; πίσσῃ ib.195, cf. Inscr.Délos442A188 (ii B. C.); “ἀσφάλτῳ” X.Cyr.7.5.22 (Pass.); “στοάν” Supp.Epigr.4.268 (Panamara, ii A. D.):—Med., τὸ σῶμα μίλτῳ χρίονται smear their bodies, Hdt.4.191.
III. wound on the surface, puncture, prick, sting, of the gadfly in A.Pr.566,597, 880 (all lyr.):—Pass., ὀξυστόμῳ μύωπι χρισθεῖσ᾽ ib.675.
Notice:
Therefore, the Christos (χριστος) - Is the one who is stung by the gadfly
The Christos:
For us to understand the dragon, if you notice at the bottom of this definition of χριο right which to rub with scented anguents, rubbing and anointing stuff to wash to wash something ove, and you can wash with other things it doesn't have to be water, you can wash with oils
this is just the application process
at the very bottom of this definition means to be stung by the gadfly
so the one who was stung by the gadfly that is the Christos that individual is able to enter oystermania and complete the mystery by means of the trinity and this is soteria (savior) s t r - salvation
Will we ever get away from the boys? I'm trying from the naked boy in the garden with Jesus
Our job here as saturnians, as satanists, is to show you that naked boy and that means we have to go to some pretty awful places and deal with some pretty awful people and see the reality
yes and isn't that the moment isn't that when you perceive the reality and that Awakening -- isn't that the real profound moment?