There were 12 original diciples
From Matthew 10:2–4; Mark 3:16–19; Luke 6:14–16:
In the New Testament the symbolism of “twelve” points to the twelve tribes of Israel (e.g., “you will sit on twelve thrones judging the twelve tribes,” Matt 19:28; Luke 22:30)
The lists in Matthew, Mark, and Luke differ slightly (especially Thaddaeus/Judas son of James). Even the earliest tradition was unstable.
But we'll see shortly, that 12 is not everyone....
Paul isn’t in the canonical list of the Twelve.
Outsider status
The Twelve are the inner circle chosen by Jesus during his lifetime (names given in Matt 10, Mark 3, Luke 6). Paul comes later. In his own letters (e.g. Galatians 1:1, 1 Cor 15:8–9) he emphasizes that he was called “as one untimely born” (ὡσπερεὶ τῷ ἐκτρώματι) and that he is not one of the Twelve but an apostle by special vision/revelation.
After Judas Iscariot’s death, Acts 1:26 says the group replaced him with Matthias to restore the number to twelve. Paul is outside that system.
Canonical Gospels are attributed, then tradition names them as:
Dr Hillman: I'm going to resort to John Scarboro's training, and I'm just going to, look at the primary sources. To me it's all that matters. If you ask me the same question of when Mark was dated or when the New Testament, I would answer from the perspective of reading it. And say, "What other texts have I read that are using similar vocabulary and style?" And from that you can put it straight: first to second, late first, second, centuries. And it's meshing perfectly with the apocryphal. These texts are using the same vocabulary. It's gorgeous. So I would put it, look: These are second century texts.Danny: That's consensus or or what?
Luke Gorton: The consensus and again....
Danny: I hate it when people always fall back on consensus for everything cuz that's what most people in my experience have done when I ask for expletive you know.
Luke Gorton: Sure. Yeah. The consensus is it was probably written in the 60s like around 65. Which is last half of the first century of course. Um, the consensus, for whatever that's worth, is that it was written in the in the years leading up to the Jewish revolt against the Romans, which which took place between ' 66 and 70, which is a a watershed event in in Jewish and Roman relations, as you can imagine.
Danny: So, so that would have been Mark.
Luke Gorton: That would have been Mark. And then the and then again, the we're talking the consensus here is that Matthew and Luke were a little bit later. Um, again the consensus is that Matthew and Luke use Mark as a source because they have a lot of the same material. The three of them, Mark, Matthew, and Luke are called the synoptic gospels, right? Which comes from two Greek words that mean to see together, sinoptic. Um, so they seem they have a lot of the same material. The consensus is that Matthew and Luke already have Mark in front of them. So Mark had already been written by the time Matthew and Luke are writing their gospels, which can which can help explain why they have so much similar material. Luke right in his prologue says, "I wasn't there, but i've done my research and I'm using sources." So Luke tells us right up front that he is reading earlier material and talking to eyewitnesses because Luke wasn't there. He didn't see Jesus. So, so Luke tells us right up front he has earlier sources and it seems like Mark was probably one of them. Uh John is kind of off in his own world doing his own thing. Um he he's he he has a lot of different material from the other three gospels. Most people date John as the latest one, maybe in the 90s, but some people would put it later. Um, Matthew and Luke maybe being in the 70s or 80s, but again, I think I think these are all estimates.
These four Gospels form the backbone of the Greek New Testament
The New Testament has many more authors: Paul is by far the most prolific (13 epistles under his name), then other letters attributed to Peter, James, John, Jude, and finally the anonymous author of Hebrews. The Apocalypse is ascribed to John.
So if we think in terms of power figures in the cult, the Twelve are just the ritualized list. The real forces shaping the movement also include Paul, James the Brother, Barnabas, Luke, Mark, and Mary Magdalene.
| Apostle | Birth (est.) | Death (est./tradition) | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Simon Peter | c. 1–10 CE | c. 64–67 CE (Rome, crucified upside-down under Nero) | Leader of the Twelve |
| Andrew (brother of Peter) | early 1st c. | c. 60–70 CE (Patras, crucifixion) | Mission to Greece |
| James son of Zebedee | unknown | 44 CE (executed by Herod Agrippa, Acts 12:2) | Only apostolic death in NT |
| John son of Zebedee | c. 0–10 CE? | c. 90–100 CE (Ephesus, natural death per tradition) | “Beloved disciple” |
| Philip | unknown | c. 80 CE (Hierapolis, crucifixion/stoning) | |
| Bartholomew (Nathanael?) | unknown | c. 70–100 CE (flayed/crucified, Armenia or India) | |
| Thomas (Didymus, “Twin”) | unknown | c. 72 CE (India, speared) | |
| Matthew (Levi) | unknown | c. 70–100 CE (traditions vary: Ethiopia, Persia) | Attributed author of Gospel |
| James son of Alphaeus | unknown | c. 62 CE (stoned/beheaded in Jerusalem) | Often conflated w/ James the Just |
| Thaddaeus (Judas son of James, Lebbaeus) | unknown | 60s–70s CE (traditions: Syria/Persia) | |
| Simon the Zealot | unknown | unknown (traditions: Persia/Britain) | Revolutionary zeal link |
| Judas Iscariot | unknown | c. 30 CE (suicide/fall, Matt 27 / Acts 1) | Replaced by Matthias |
| Matthias (replacement) | unknown | unknown (stoned/beheaded, traditions: Jerusalem/Colchis) | Acts 1:26 |
| Paul (Saul) | c. 5 CE (Tarsus) | c. 64–67 CE (Rome, beheaded under Nero) | “Apostle to the nations” |
| Barnabas | early 1st c. (Cyprus) | c. 61 CE (traditions: stoned in Cyprus) | Companion of Paul, called an “apostle” in Acts 14:14 |
| James the Just (Brother of the Lord) | c. early 1st c. | c. 62 CE (stoned/beaten in Jerusalem, Josephus/Hegesippus) | Head of Jerusalem church; not one of the Twelve |
| Luke (Evangelist) | early 1st c. (Antioch?) | unknown (traditions: 84 CE, Boeotia, natural death) | Physician, companion of Paul, author of Luke–Acts |
| Mark (John Mark) | early 1st c. (Jerusalem) | c. 68 CE (Alexandria, martyred by dragging) | Companion of Peter and Paul, author of Gospel of Mark |
| Mary Magdalene | early 1st c. (Magdala) | unknown (later traditions: Ephesus or France) | Key resurrection witness; not counted among the Twelve |
Total NT size ≈ 138,000 words (Nestle 1904). Percentages approximate by word count.
| Author (traditional) | Canonical Writings | % of NT | Non-canonical / attributed works |
|---|---|---|---|
| Paul | 13 letters (Rom–Phlm, Pastoral epistles disputed) | ~28% | Acts of Paul and Thecla, 3 Corinthians |
| Luke | Gospel of Luke + Acts | ~27% | Sometimes linked to Acts of Paul and Thecla |
| John | Gospel of John, 1–3 John, Revelation (disputed) | ~20% | Apocryphon of John (Gnostic), others not canonical |
| Matthew | Gospel of Matthew | ~13% | Gospel of the Hebrews/Nazarenes (possibly linked) |
| Mark | Gospel of Mark | ~7% | Occasionally linked to Gospel of Peter (not certain) |
| Peter | 1–2 Peter (2 Peter disputed) | ~2% | Gospel of Peter, Apocalypse of Peter |
| James | Letter of James | ~1.5% | Protoevangelium of James (infancy gospel) |
| Jude | Letter of Jude | ~0.5% | None directly, but quotes 1 Enoch, Assumption of Moses |
| Anonymous | Hebrews | ~3.5% | Pseudonymous “Pauline” in some traditions |
All were written >30-70 years after Jesus's death.
| Century CE | Major works | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| 50s–60s | Early Paul (1 Thess, Gal, 1–2 Cor, Romans, Philippians, Philemon, Colossians) | Earliest Greek NT texts |
| 60s–70s | James, Mark | Earliest Gospel (Mark) |
| 70s–90s | Matthew, Luke, Acts, Jude, Hebrews | Mid-late composition, incorporating oral traditions |
| 90s–100 | John (Gospel), 1–3 John, Revelation | Latest canonical NT books |
In a nutshell:
There are 12 disciples. That's not because of the 12 tribes. Jesus was establishing the Aionic order, the Dodekad. Just like Heracles did, by his 12 labors, established the worship of the 12. It's Zodiacal. Ancient Hebrews followed Zodiac worship.

In the center panel sits a magnificent zodiac wheel, featuring, among other pagan images, depictions of naked humans—including a conspicuously uncircumcised Libra. The wheel encircles a haloed Helios, the Greek sun god, mounted atop his chariot. Women representing each of the four seasons sit to the corners of the zodiac, with the accompanying Hebrew inscription of the names of the seasons.
Pagan imagery in a house of worship would appear a flagrant violation of their own "Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image," but similar synagogue zodiacs have been found in sites such as Tzippori and Beth Alpha.
This is why we say that Jesus and the ancient Hebrews were following the same tradition that was older.
Each boy represented a star-sign, just as in the Orphic and Mithraic mysteries the initiate passes through the 12 gates of heaven. The “fishermen” were not literal, but Piscine—Pisces. The “twins” echo Gemini. The traitor with the purse is Libra with its scales. When Jesus sets them in order, he is arranging the zodiacal table, a thiasos of astral tokens.
Art history around the Mediterranean?
Early-modern curiosity (closest you’ll get to a mapping):
ἀποκριθεὶς δὲ ὁ Ἰησοῦς εἶπεν αὐτῷ·Μακάριος εἶ, Σίμων Βαριωνᾶ…κἀγὼ δέ σοι λέγω ὅτι σὺ εἶ Πέτρος
Jesus answered him:“Blessed are you, Simon son of Jonah… and I tell you that you are Peter.”
εἶπεν· Σὺ εἶ Σίμων ὁ υἱὸς Ἰωάννου· σὺ κληθήσῃ Κηφᾶςὃ ἑρμηνεύεται Πέτρος
“You are Simon son of John; you shall be called Cephas (which is translated Peter).”
29 Καὶ εὐθὺς ἐκ τῆς συναγωγῆς ἐξελθόντες ἦλθον εἰς τὴν οἰκίαν Σίμωνος καὶ Ἀνδρέου μετὰ Ἰακώβου καὶ Ἰωάννου.30 ἡ δὲ πενθερὰ Σίμωνος κατέκειτο πυρέσσουσα, καὶ εὐθὺς λέγουσιν αὐτῷ περὶ αὐτῆς.31 καὶ προσελθὼν ἤγειρεν αὐτὴν κρατήσας τῆς χειρός…
29 And immediately, coming out of the synagogue, they went into the house of Simon and Andrew, with James and John.30 Now Simon’s mother-in-law was lying sick with a fever, and they immediately told him about her.31 And coming to her, he raised her up, taking her by the hand…
εἶδεν τὴν πενθερὰν αὐτοῦ βεβλημένην καὶ πυρέσσουσαν“
He saw his mother-in-law lying down and feverish…”
ἡ πενθερὰ τοῦ Σίμωνος ἦν συνεχομένη πυρετῷ μεγάλῳ“
Simon’s mother-in-law was held by a great fever…”
Sounds like Peter/Simon is married. (this doesn't prove taxable age).
Let's pretend that they're bearded men around 30CE when Jesus died (25-50yrs old), then how did they live to ~70-110 CE to write the New Testament?
The Gospels themselves call them neaniskoi νεανίσκοι, a term for sexual maturity neaniskos refers to young and small (mikros/μικρός says Heyschius, which means small) boys barely pubescent. The Gospel narrative repeatedly frames apostles around Jesus using youth-status language (νεανίσκος / παιδάριον), dependency markers, and guardian-style speech patterns, rather than settled adult householders. None have wives, nor homes.
Only one of them (Jesus) qualified (of age) to pay to the tax-collectors (attested in the NT), none were gray-bearded sages. Read on for the source text evidence:
In the didrachma episode (Matt 17:24–27), payment is ultimately rendered for Jesus, which presupposes that Jesus himself is within the class that could be expected to pay.
Jesus's argument asserts status-based exemption (υἱοί vs. ἀλλότριοι) for the other apostles as "sons" below the taxable age...
NOTE: In the Greek New Testament, Σίμων (Simon) and Πέτρος (Peter) are two names for the same individual.
24 Ἐλθόντων δὲ αὐτῶν εἰς Καφαρναοὺμ, προσῆλθον οἱ τὰ δίδραχμα λαμβάνοντες τῷ Πέτρῳ καὶ εἶπαν·Ὁ διδάσκαλος ὑμῶν οὐ τελεῖ τὰ δίδραχμα;
24 When they came into Capernaum, the (tax) collectors of the didrachma (money) came to Peter and said: “Does your teacher not pay the didrachma?”
25 λέγει· Ναί. καὶ ἐλθόντα εἰς τὴν οἰκίαν προέφθασεν αὐτὸν ὁ Ἰησοῦς λέγων·Τί σοι δοκεῖ, Σίμων; οἱ βασιλεῖς τῆς γῆς ἀπὸ τίνων λαμβάνουσι τέλη ἢ κῆνσον; ἀπὸ τῶν υἱῶν αὐτῶν ἢ ἀπὸ τῶν ἀλλοτρίων;
25 He said, Yes. And when he entered the house, Jesus spoke first, saying: “What do you think, Simon (Peter)? From whom do the kings of the earth take taxes or tribute — from their own sons, or from strangers?”
26 εἰπόντος δὲ· Ἀπὸ τῶν ἀλλοτρίων, ἔφη αὐτῷ ὁ Ἰησοῦς·Ἄραγε ἐλεύθεροί εἰσιν οἱ υἱοί.
26 When he (Simon/Peter) said, From strangers, Jesus said to him: “Therefore the sons are free.”
27 ἵνα δὲ μὴ σκανδαλίσωμεν αὐτούς,
πορευθεὶς εἰς θάλασσαν βάλε ἄγκιστρον,
καὶ τὸν ἀναβάντα πρῶτον ἰχθὺν ἆρον·
καὶ ἀνοίξας τὸ στόμα αὐτοῦ εὑρήσεις στατῆρα·
ἐκεῖνον λαβὼν δὸς αὐτοῖς ἀντὶ ἐμοῦ καὶ σοῦ.
27 But so that we may not offend them,go to the sea, cast a hook,
Notice:
This is exactly how a senior household member interacts with a dependent younger male in Greek narrative.
Nowhere in the Gospels:
Instead, they are repeatedly:
Bottom Line:
In 30 CE, the age at which a male became liable for the Temple half-shekel (δίδραχμα) was twenty years old — and this is attested directly in the Greek Septuagint, not later rabbinic tradition.
πᾶς ὁ διαπορευόμενος εἰς ἀριθμόν, ἀπὸ εἴκοσι ἐτῶν καὶ ἐπάνω, δώσει τὴν εἰσφορὰν Κυρίῳ.
“Everyone who passes into the census, from twenty years and upward, shall give the contribution to the Lord.”
There is no Gospel tax scene involving Paul, because:
Bottom Line:
See The Apostles were Eunuchs writeup below... for more.
12 εἰσὶν γὰρ εὐνοῦχοι οἵτινες ἐκ κοιλίας μητρὸς ἐγεννήθησαν οὕτως, καὶ εἰσὶν εὐνοῦχοι οἵτινες εὐνουχίσθησαν ὑπὸ τῶν ἀνθρώπων καὶ εἰσὶν εὐνοῦχοι οἵτινες εὐνούχισαν ἑαυτοὺς διὰ τὴν βασιλείαν τῶν οὐρανῶν. ὁ δυνάμενος χωρεῖν χωρείτω.
12 “For there are eunuchs who were born so from their mother’s womb,
and there are eunuchs who were made eunuchs by men
and there are eunuchs who made themselves eunuchs because of the kingdom of the heavens.
Let the one who is able to receive this, receive it.”
They were chosen because their bodies, like those of venom pharmakos victims, were considered ritually potent. Their blood and serum, under venom exposure, produced antivenom. This is what they brought to the rite, not wisdom.
they helped Jesus see the kingdom of heaven.
Despite referencing exclusively the more technical Greek Septuagint, which contains a very Hellenic and Orphic version of the inner cosmos...
...the apostle's own testaments & writings betray ignorance. They constantly fail to understand the logos. They fall asleep in Gethsemane, they scatter in fear, they deny their master. This is not wisdom; it is the normal result of drugged boys at the threshold of ecstasy. Their “visions” are pharmaka-induced:
What they saw was real only in the same sense that the Eleusinian saw Persephone in a flash of light.
Far from paragons, they are repeatedly shown as squabbling over who is greatest, betraying for silver, or fleeing naked into the night leaving only a sindon (medical grade fine linen bandage) behind. With further context for the sindon, evidence of venom poisoning given by Mark 14-51 Translation from Source:
From a Hellenic lens this is not a tale of divine heroes, but of misused ritual youths, bound into a rite that parodied our older mysteries. Their greed, their fear, and their ignorance expose the poverty of the sect.
Evidence in the Early Christian Cult:
12 εἰσὶν γὰρ εὐνοῦχοι οἵτινες ἐκ κοιλίας μητρὸς ἐγεννήθησαν οὕτως, καὶ εἰσὶν εὐνοῦχοι οἵτινες εὐνουχίσθησαν ὑπὸ τῶν ἀνθρώπων καὶ εἰσὶν εὐνοῦχοι οἵτινες εὐνούχισαν ἑαυτοὺς διὰ τὴν βασιλείαν τῶν οὐρανῶν. ὁ δυνάμενος χωρεῖν χωρείτω.
12 “For there are eunuchs who were born so from their mother’s womb,
and there are eunuchs who were made eunuchs by men
and there are eunuchs who made themselves eunuchs because of the kingdom of the heavens.
Let the one who is able to receive this, receive it.”
Eunuchs were created for the "kingdom of heaven", Jesus's kingdom, by men or by themselves.
There's a chemical castration technology used in antiquity via Hemlock held to the testicles using a Sindon bandage. A practice that goes back to pre-christian traditions, like Eleusis.
Apostles used Greek, they did not rely on another language for doctrine, scripture, or theology, just Greek.
Logical Conclusion, the apostles didn't have another language to refer to, or it wasn't relevant... so they used Greek because it was natural and already authoritative.